Where are you?
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Guernsey
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Jersey
  • Luxembourg
  • Malta
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Portugal
  • Spain
  • Singapore
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • United Kingdom
  • Rest of World
It looks like you’re in
Not your location?
And finally, please confirm the following details
I’m {role} in {country} and I agree to comply with the terms of the website.
You are viewing as from Change

Hawkish or dovish hikes

Past performance does not predict future returns. You may get back less than you originally invested. Reference to specific securities is not intended as a recommendation to purchase or sell any investment.

After the ECB was hawkish last week (albeit only relative to expectations), focus turned to the widely predicted rate rises from the Federal Reserve and Bank of England.

On Wednesday, the Fed started its policy tightening journey with a 25 basis point rate hike. The hawkish surprises that arose were the increase to its inflation projections and a lurch upwards in the dot plot of future policy rate forecasts.

The Fed’s median expectation for PCE inflation (its preferred measure) in 2022 jumped from 2.6% to 4.3%; even by 2024, the rate is forecast to still be above target at 2.3%. It is clear that with rampant inflation and a hot labour market, monetary policy needs to be much tighter. The dot plots have shifted, with the median forecast now representing a further six rate hikes in 2022 and another three to four in 2023. To me, the most interesting part of the FOMC’s report was that participants now have the Federal funds rate finishing both 2023 and 2024 at 2.8%, a level above its estimated neutral rate of 2.4%. 

So, if (and it’s a very big if) the Fed stays on its current rate hiking path, then it’s going to take monetary policy into tight territory. This is something they have failed to achieve since the financial crisis.  Furthermore, quantitative tightening (QT) will start in Powell’s words “at a coming meeting”. He estimates its impact will be the equivalent of another 25bps hike this year, taking us to seven plus one for the year as a whole.

We have been stating for a while that we believe that the neutral rate is somewhere in the 2.0% to 2.5% range and that the US economy could cope with this level, which would leave the long-term real neutral rate close to zero or possibly even in positive territory. Given the amount of debt outstanding around the world and in the US, base rates close to 3% would have a large impact on economic activity levels. The bond market’s reaction has been a yield curve flattening: 10-year bond yields dipped briefly below those on the 5-year.

Finally, the Fed is showing its hawkish credentials and taking inflation seriously. For the first time, its forecasts are effectively ahead of the bond market. The market is assuming either the Fed cannot deliver all the planned hikes or that some will be rapidly unwound as a recession is created. I believe the US economy is strong enough for the Fed to get to neutral rates and unwind $3 trillion of QE. However, I doubt that a 2.8% Fed funds rate will be reached, let alone maintained.

Referencing Putin’s war on Ukraine, the Fed stated: “the invasion and related events are likely to create additional upward pressure on inflation and weigh on economic activity”. The US does have a few advantages: being a small net energy exporter, being able to increase shale production, and being geographically distant from the war.

The UK does not share such advantages, so retail price inflation could now peak above 10%. It was anticipated that the headline peak in both retail price inflation and consumer price inflation would be in April, but if energy prices stay at elevated levels then October may represent the zenith as the Ofgem price cap increases for the February to August assessment period feed through.

Thus, the Bank of England faces a particularly acute policy trade-off, trying to put the inflationary genie back in the bottle at the same time as the UK consumer suffers a cost-of-living crisis. In its words, “developments since the February Report are likely to accentuate both the peak in inflation and the adverse impact on activity by intensifying the squeeze on household incomes”. Clearly the latter factor has influenced the MPC members to a greater extent and the rate rise today was accompanied by dovish language.

The vote itself was eight to one, with Cunliffe the dissenter looking to hold rates steady. In my opinion, the taming of the hawks was more pertinent as four voters who previously wanted a 50bps hike found new comfort in their dovecotes. Rates markets have focused on the following sentence: “based on its current assessment of the economic situation, the committee judges that some further modest tightening in monetary policy may be appropriate in the coming months, but there are risks on both sides of that judgement”. 

Certainly, the pace of Bank of England rate rises will be slower than the market had forecast ahead of today’s meeting. Inflation still needs to be conquered as there is the risk it becomes self-fulfilling through the feedback loop of corporate and consumer expectations, in particular wage inflation. It should be borne in mind that the Bank of England has said it can start QT once rates hit 1%, which is only one hike away. This gives them another tool, but it will still be a good few years until inflation is back down anywhere near target. The UK may be the one exception where the central bank actually has to create a recession to get inflation back to 2%. 

The crux of the problem is that developed world monetary policy was kept too loose for too long and a blind eye was turned toward inflation. It is clearly not transitory and now rates have to go up further than they otherwise would have. Exogenous events, such as the energy price crisis, are beyond central bankers’ control. But the monetary policy tightening journey would have been so much smoother if it had been started before inflation became embedded in expectations.

Understand common financial words and terms See our glossary
Key Risks 
Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income generated from it can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. You may get back less than you originally invested. The issue of units/shares in Liontrust Funds may be subject to an initial charge, which will have an impact on the realisable value of the investment, particularly in the short term. Investments should always be considered as long term.
Investment in Funds managed by the Global Fixed Income team involves foreign currencies and may be subject to fluctuations in value due to movements in exchange rates. The value of fixed income securities will fall if the issuer is unable to repay its debt or has its credit rating reduced. Generally, the higher the perceived credit risk of the issuer, the higher the rate of interest. Bond markets may be subject to reduced liquidity. The Funds may invest in emerging markets/soft currencies which may have the effect of increasing volatility. Some of the Funds may invest in derivatives. The use of derivatives may create leverage or gearing. A relatively small movement in the value of a derivative's underlying investment may have a larger impact, positive or negative, on the value of a fund than if the underlying investment was held instead.


This is a marketing communication. Before making an investment, you should read the relevant Prospectus and the Key Investor Information Document (KIID), which provide full product details including investment charges and risks. These documents can be obtained, free of charge, from www.liontrust.co.uk or direct from Liontrust. Always research your own investments. If you are not a professional investor please consult a regulated financial adviser regarding the suitability of such an investment for you and your personal circumstances. 
This should not be construed as advice for investment in any product or security mentioned, an offer to buy or sell units/shares of Funds mentioned, or a solicitation to purchase securities in any company or investment product. Examples of stocks are provided for general information only to demonstrate our investment philosophy. The investment being promoted is for units in a fund, not directly in the underlying assets. It contains information and analysis that is believed to be accurate at the time of publication, but is subject to change without notice. Whilst care has been taken in compiling the content of this document, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made by Liontrust as to its accuracy or completeness, including for external sources (which may have been used) which have not been verified. It should not be copied, forwarded, reproduced, divulged or otherwise distributed in any form whether by way of fax, email, oral or otherwise, in whole or in part without the express and prior written consent of Liontrust. Always research your own investments and if you are not a professional investor please consult a regulated financial adviser regarding the suitability of such an investment for you and your personal circumstances. 
Phil Milburn
Phil Milburn
Phil Milburn joined Liontrust in January 2018 from Kames Capital to co-create the Liontrust Global Fixed Income team. Phil previously spent over 20 years at Kames Capital, launching one of the market’s first strategic bond funds and developing a leading high-yield franchise.

More from the team


How to invest in Liontrust funds

Through a fund platform
Through a financial adviser
Direct with Liontrust